Open Access

Fuzzy n-Jordan *-homomorphisms in induced fuzzy C*-algebras

  • Choonkil Park1,
  • Shahram Ghaffary Ghaleh2,
  • Khatereh Ghasemi3 and
  • Sun Young Jang4Email author
Advances in Difference Equations20122012:42

DOI: 10.1186/1687-1847-2012-42

Received: 27 January 2012

Accepted: 5 April 2012

Published: 5 April 2012

Abstract

Using fixed point method, we prove the fuzzy version of the Hyers-Ulam stability of n-Jordan *-homomorphisms in induced fuzzy C*-algebras associated with the following functional equation

f x + y + z 3 + f x - 2 y + z 3 + f x + y - 2 z 3 = f ( x ) .

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010): Primary 46S40; 47S40; 39B52; 47H10; 46L05.

Keywords

fuzzy n-Jordan *-homomorphism induced fuzzy C*-algebra Hyers-Ulam stability.

1. Introduction and preliminaries

The stability of functional equations originated from a question of Ulam [1] concerning the stability of group homomorphisms in 1940. More precisely, he proposed the following problem: Given a group https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-1847-2012-42/MediaObjects/13662_2012_Article_157_IEq1_HTML.gif , a metric group G , d and ε > 0, does there exist a δ > 0 such that if a function f : G G satisfies the inequality d(f(xy), f(x)f(y)) < δ for all x , y G , then there exists a homomorphism T : G G such that d(f(x), T(x)) < ε for all x G ? Hyers [2] gave a partial solution of the Ulam's problem for the case of approximate additive mappings under the assumption that https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-1847-2012-42/MediaObjects/13662_2012_Article_157_IEq1_HTML.gif and G are Banach spaces. Aoki [3] generalized the Hyers' theorem for approximately additive mappings. Rassias [4] generalized the theorem of Hyers by considering the stability problem with unbounded Cauchy differences.

Let X be a set. A function d: X × X → [0, ∞] is called a generalized metric on X if d satisfies
  1. (1)

    d(x, y) = 0 if and only if x = y;

     
  2. (2)

    d(x, y) = d(y, x) for all x, y X;

     
  3. (3)

    d(x, z) ≤ d(x, y) + d(y, z) for all x, y, z X.

     

We recall a fundamental result in fixed point theory.

Theorem 1.1. [5, 6]Let (X, d) be a complete generalized metric space and let J: XX be a strictly contractive mapping with Lipschitz constant L < 1. Then for each given element x X, either
d J n x , J n + 1 x =
for all nonnegative integers n or there exists a positive integer n 0 such that
  1. (1)

    d(J n x, Jn+1x) < ∞, nn0;

     
  2. (2)

    the sequence {J n x} converges to a fixed point y* of J;

     
  3. (3)

    y* is the unique fixed point of J in the set Y = { y X | d ( J n 0 x , y ) < } ;

     
  4. (4)

    d ( y , y * ) 1 1 - L d y , J y for all y Y.

     

Isac and Rassias [7] were the first to provide applications of stability theory of functional equations for the proof of new fixed point theorems with applications. By using fixed point methods, the stability problems of several functional equations have been extensively investigated by a number of authors (see [812]).

Katsaras [13] defined a fuzzy norm on a vector space to construct a fuzzy vector topological structure on the space. Some mathematics have defined fuzzy normed on a vector space from various points of view [1420]. In particular, Bag and Samanta [21] following Cheng and Mordeson [22], gave an idea of fuzzy norm in such a manner that the corresponding fuzzy metric is of Kramosil and Michalek type [23]. They established a decomposition theorem of a fuzzy norm into a family of crisp norms and investigated some properties of fuzzy normed spaces [24].

We use the definition of fuzzy normed spaces given in [16, 17, 21] to investigate a fuzzy version of the Hyers-Ulam stability of n-Jordan *-homomorphisms in induced fuzzy C*- algebras associated with the following functional equation
f x + y + z 3 + f x - 2 y + z 3 + f x + y - 2 z 3 = f ( x ) .

Definition 1.2. [1618, 21] Let https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-1847-2012-42/MediaObjects/13662_2012_Article_157_IEq10_HTML.gif be a complex vector space. A function N : X × 0 , 1 is called a fuzzy norm on https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-1847-2012-42/MediaObjects/13662_2012_Article_157_IEq10_HTML.gif if for all x , y X and all s, t ,

N1: N(x, t) = 0 for t ≤ 0

N2: x = 0 if and only if N(x, t) = 1 for all t > 0

N3: N ( c x , t ) = N x , t c if c -{0}

N4: N(x + y, s + t) ≥ min{N(x, s), N(y, t)}

N5: N(x, ·) is a non-decreasing function of and limt→∞N(x, t) = 1

N6: for x ≠ 0, N(x, .) is continuous on .

The pair X , N is called a fuzzy normed vector space.

Definition 1.3. [1618, 21] Let X , N be a fuzzy normed vector space.
  1. (1)

    A sequence {x n } in χ is said to be convergent if there exists an x χ such that limn→∞N(x n - x, t) = 1 for all t > 0. In this case, x is called the limit of the sequence {x n } and we denote it by N- lim n→∞ x n = x.

     
  2. (2)

    A sequence {x n } in χ is called Cauchy if for each ε > 0 and each t > 0 there exists an n0 such that for all nn0 and all p > 0, we have N(xn+p-x n , t) > 1-ε.

     

It is well-known that every convergent sequence in a fuzzy normed vector space is Cauchy. If each Cauchy sequence is convergent, then the fuzzy norm is said to be complete and the fuzzy normed vector space is called a fuzzy Banach space.

We say that a mapping f : X Y between fuzzy normed vector space X , Y is continuous at point x 0 X if for each sequence {x n } converging to x0 in https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-1847-2012-42/MediaObjects/13662_2012_Article_157_IEq10_HTML.gif , then the sequence {f(x n )} converges to f (x0). If f : X Y is continuous at each x X , then f : X Y is said to be continuous on https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-1847-2012-42/MediaObjects/13662_2012_Article_157_IEq10_HTML.gif (see [24]).

Definition 1.4. Let https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-1847-2012-42/MediaObjects/13662_2012_Article_157_IEq10_HTML.gif be a *-algebra and X , N a fuzzy normed space.
  1. (1)
    The fuzzy normed space X , N is called a fuzzy normed *-algebra if
    N x y , s t N x , s N ( y , t ) & N ( x * , t ) = N ( x , t )
     
  2. (2)

    A complete fuzzy normed *-algebra is called a fuzzy Banach *-algebra.

     
Example 1.5. Let X be a normed *-algebra. let
N ( x , t ) = t t + x , t  > 0, x X 0 , t 0, x X .

Then N(x, t) is a fuzzy norm on https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-1847-2012-42/MediaObjects/13662_2012_Article_157_IEq10_HTML.gif and X , N ( x , t ) is a fuzzy normed *-algebra.

Definition 1.6. Let X be a C*-algebra and N X a fuzzy norm on https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-1847-2012-42/MediaObjects/13662_2012_Article_157_IEq10_HTML.gif .
  1. (1)

    The fuzzy normed *-algebra ( X , N X ) is called an induced fuzzy normed *-algebra

     
  2. (2)

    The fuzzy Banach *-algebra ( X , N X ) is called an induced fuzzy C*-algebra.

     
Definition 1.7. Let ( X , N X ) and Y , N be induced fuzzy normed *-algebras. Then a -linear mapping H : ( X , N X ) ( Y N ) is called a fuzzy n-Jordan *-homomorphism if
H ( x n ) = H x n & H ( x * ) = H ( x ) *

for all x X .

Throughout this article, assume that X , N is an induced fuzzy normed *-algebra and that Y , N is an induced fuzzy C*-algebra.

2. Main results

Lemma 2.1. Let ( Z N ) be a fuzzy normed vector space and let f : X Z be a mapping such that
N f x + y + z 3 + f x - 2 y + z 3 + f x + y - 2 z 3 , t N f ( x ) , t 2
(2.1)

for all x , y , z X and all t > 0. Then f is additive, i.e., f(x + y) = f(x) + f(y) for all x , y X .

Proof. Letting x = y = z = 0 in (2.1), we get
N ( 3 f ( 0 ) , t ) = N f ( 0 ) , t 3 N f ( 0 ) , t 2

for all t > 0. By N5 and N6, N(f(0), t) = 1 for all t > 0. It follows from N2 that f(0) = 0.

Letting z = -x, y = x, x = 0 in (2.1), we get
N f ( 0 ) + f ( - x ) + f ( x ) , t N f ( 0 ) , t 2 = 1
for all t > 0. It follows from N2 that f(-x) + f(x) = 0 for all x X . So
f ( - x ) = - f ( x )

for all x X .

Letting x = 0 and replacing y, z by 3y, 3z, respectively, in (2.1), we get
N ( f ( y + z ) + f ( - 2 y + z ) + f ( y - 2 z ) , t ) N f ( 0 ) , t 2 = 1
for all t > 0. It follows from N2 that
f y + z + f - 2 y + z + f y - 2 z = 0
(2.2)
for all y , z X . Let t = 2y-z and s = 2z-y in (2.2), we obtain
f ( t + s ) = f t + f ( s )

for all t , s X , as desired. □

Using fixed point method, we prove the Hyers-Ulam stability of fuzzy n-Jordan *-homomorphisms in induced fuzzy C*-algebras.

Theorem 2.2. Let φ : X 3 [ 0 , ) be a function such that there exists an L < 3 3 n with
φ x 3 , y 3 , z 3 L 3 φ ( x , y , z )
(2.3)
for all x , y , z X . Let f : X Y be a mapping such that
N f μ x + μ y + μ z 3 + f μ x - 2 μ y + μ z 3 + f μ x + μ y - 2 μ z 3 - μ f ( x ) , t t t + φ ( x , y , z ) ,
(2.4)
N f ( x n ) - f ( x ) n , t t t + φ ( x , 0 , 0 ) ,
(2.5)
N ( f ( x * ) - f ( x ) * , t ) t t + φ ( x , 0 , 0 )
(2.6)
for all x , y , z X , all t > 0 and all μ T 1 : = { λ : | λ | = 1 } . Then H x = N - li m n 3 n f x 3 n exists for each x X and defines a fuzzy n-Jordan *-homomorphism H : X Y such that
N f ( x ) - H ( x ) , t ( 1 - L ) t 1 - L t + φ ( x , 0 , 0 )
(2.7)

for all x X and all t > 0.

Proof. Letting μ = 1 and y = z = 0 in (2.4), we get
N 3 f x 3 - f ( x ) , t t t + φ ( x , 0 , 0 )
(2.8)

for all x X .

Consider the set
S : = { g : X Y }
and introduce the generalized metric on S:
d ( g , h ) = inf α + : N g ( x ) - h ( x ) , α t t t + φ ( x , 0 , 0 ) , x X , t > 0 ,

where, as usual, inf ϕ = +∞. It is easy to show that (S, d) is complete (see the proof of [[25], Lemma 2.1]).

Now we consider the linear mapping J: SS such that
J g ( x ) : = 3 g x 3

for all x X.

Let g, h S be given such that d(g, h) = ε. Then
N ( g ( x ) - h x , ε t ) t t + φ ( x , 0 , 0 )
for all x X and all t > 0. Hence
N J g ( x ) - J h x , L ε t = N 3 g x 3 - 3 h x 3 , L ε t = N g x 3 - h x 3 , L 3 ε t L t 3 L t 3 + φ x 3 , 0 , 0 L t 3 L t 3 + L 3 φ x , 0 , 0 = t t + φ x , 0 , 0
for all x X and all t > 0. So d(g, h) = ε implies that d(Jg, Jh) ≤ . This means that
d ( J g , J h ) L d ( g , h )

for all g, h S.

It follows from (2.8) that d(f, Jf) ≤ 1.

By Theorem 1.1, there exists a mapping H : X Y satisfying the following:
  1. (1)
    H is a fixed point of J, i.e.,
    H x 3 = 1 3 H ( x )
    (2.9)
     
for all x X . The mapping H is a unique fixed point of J in the set
M = { g S : d ( f , g ) < } .
This implies that H is a unique mapping satisfying (2.9) such that there exists a α (0, ∞) satisfying
N ( f x - H x , α t ) t t  +  φ  ( x , 0, 0)
for all x X ;
  1. (2)
    d(J k f, H) → 0 as k → ∞. This implies the equality
    N - lim k 3 k f x 3 k = H ( x )
     
for all x X ;
  1. (3)
    d ( f , H ) 1 1 - L d f , J f , which implies the inequality
    d ( f , H ) 1 1 - L .
     

This implies that the inequality (2.7) holds.

It follows from (2.3) that
k = 0 3 k φ x 3 k , y 3 k , z 3 k <

for all x , y , z X .

By (2.4),
N 3 k f μ x + μ y + μ z 3 k + 1 + 3 k f μ x - 2 μ y + μ z 3 k + 1 + 3 k f μ x + μ y - 2 μ z 3 k + 1 - μ 3 k f x 3 k , 3 k t t t + φ x 3 k , y 3 k , z 3 k
for all x , y , z X , all t > 0 and all μ T 1 . So
N 3 k f μ x + μ y + μ z 3 k + 1 + 3 k f μ x - 2 μ y + μ z 3 k + 1 + 3 k f μ x + μ y - 2 μ z 3 k + 1 - μ 3 k f x 3 k , t t 3 k t 3 k + φ x 3 k , y 3 k , z 3 k = t t + 3 k φ x 3 k , y 3 k , z 3 k
for all x , y , z X , all t > 0 and all μ T 1 . Since lim k t t + 3 k φ x 3 k , y 3 k , z 3 k = 1 for all x , y , z X and all t > 0,
N H μ x + μ y + μ z 3 + H μ x - 2 μ y + μ z 3 + H μ x + μ y - 2 μ z 3 - μ H ( x ) , t = 1
for all x , y , z X , all t > 0 and all μ T 1 . Thus
H μ x + μ y + μ z 3 + H μ x - 2 μ y + μ z 3 + H μ x + μ y - 2 μ z 3 = μ H ( x )
(2.10)
for all x , y , z X , all t > 0 and all μ T 1 . Letting x = y = z = 0 in (2.10), we get H(0) = 0. Let μ = 1 and x = 0 in (2.10). By the same reasoning as in the proof of Lemma 2.1, one can easily show that H is additive. Letting y = z = 0 in (2.10), we get
H ( μ x ) = 3 H μ x 3 = μ H ( x )

for all x X and all μ T 1 . By [[26], Theorem 2.1], the mapping H : X Y is -linear.

By (2.5),
N 3 n k f x k 3 n k - 3 n k f x 3 k n , 3 n k t t t + φ x 3 k , 0 , 0
for all x X and all t > 0. So
N 3 n k f x k 3 n k - 3 n k f x 3 k n , t t 3 n k t 3 n k + φ x 3 k , 0 , 0 = t t + ( 3 n - 1 L ) k φ ( x , 0 , 0 )
for all x X and all t > 0. Since lim k t t + 3 n - 1 L k φ x , 0 , 0 = 1 for all x X and all t > 0,
N ( H ( x n ) - H ( x ) n , t ) = 1

for all x X and all t > 0. Thus, H(x n ) - H(x) n = 0 for all x X .

By (2.6),
N 3 k f x * 3 k - 3 k f x 3 k * , 3 k t t t + φ x 3 k , 0 , 0
for all x X and all t > 0. So
N 3 k f x * 3 k - 3 k f x 3 k * , t t 3 k t 3 k + φ t 3 k , 0 , 0 = t t + 3 k φ t 3 k , 0 , 0
for all x X and all t > 0. Since lim k t t + 3 k φ t 3 k , 0 , 0 = 1 for all x X and all t > 0,
N ( H ( x * ) - H ( x ) * , t ) = 1

for all x X and all t > 0. Thus, H(x*) - H(x)* = 0 for all x X .

Therefore, the mapping H : X Y is a fuzzy n-Jordan *-homomorphism. □

Corollary 2.3. Let θ ≥ 0 and let p be a real number with p > n. Let https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-1847-2012-42/MediaObjects/13662_2012_Article_157_IEq10_HTML.gif be a normed vector space with norm || · ||. Let f : X Y be a mapping satisfying
N f μ x + μ y + μ z 3 + f μ x - 2 μ y + μ z 3 + f μ x + μ y - 2 μ z 3 - μ f ( x ) , t t t + θ x p + y p + z p ,
(2.11)
N f x n - f x n , t t t + θ x p ,
(2.12)
N f x * - f x * , t t t + θ x p
(2.13)
for all x , y , z X , all t > 0 and all μ T 1 . Then H x = N - lim n 3 n f x 3 n exists for each x X and defines a fuzzy n-Jordan *-homomorphism H : X Y such that
N f x - H x , t 3 p - 3 t 3 p - 3 t + 3 p θ x p

for all x X and all t > 0.

Proof. The proof follows from Theorem 2.2 by taking
φ x , y , z = θ x p + y p + z p

and L = 3l-p.

Theorem 2.4. Let φ : X 3 [0, ) be a function such that there exists an L < 1 with
φ x , y , z 3 L φ x 3 , y 3 , z 3
for all x , y , z X . Let f : X Y be a mapping satisfying (2.4), (2.5), and (2.6). Then H x = N - lim n 1 3 n f 3 n x exists for each x X and defines a fuzzy n-Jordan *-homomorphism H : X Y such that
N f x - H x , t 1 - L t 1 - L t + L φ x , 0 , 0
(2.14)

for all x X and all t > 0.

Proof. Let (S, d) be the generalized metric space defined in the proof of Theorem 2.2.

Consider the linear mapping J: SS such that
J g x : = 1 3 g 3 x

for all x X .

It follows from (2.8) that
N f x - 1 3 f 3 x , 1 3 t t t + φ 3 x , 0 , 0 t t + 3 L φ x , 0 , 0
for all x X and all t > 0. So d(f, Jf) ≤ L. Hence
d f , H L 1 - L ,

which implies that the inequality (2.14) holds.

The rest of the proof is similar to the proof of Theorem 2.2. □

Corollary 2.5. Let θ ≥ 0 and let p be a positive real number with p < 1. Let https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-1847-2012-42/MediaObjects/13662_2012_Article_157_IEq10_HTML.gif be a normed vector space with norm || · || Let f : X Y be a mapping satisfying (2.11), (2.12), and (2.13). Then H x = N - lim n 1 3 n f 3 n x exists for each x X and defines a fuzzy n-Jordan *-homomorphism H : X Y such that
N f x - H x , t 3 - 3 p t 3 - 3 p t + 3 p θ x p

for all x X and all t > 0.

Proof. The proof follows from Theorem 2.4 by taking
φ x , y , z = θ x p + y p + z p

and L = 3p-l. □

Declarations

Acknowledgements

C. Park was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (NRF-2009-0070788). S.Y. Jang was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (NRF-2011-0004872).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Mathematics, Research Institute for Natural Sciences, Hanyang University
(2)
Department of Mathematics, Payame Noor University of Zahedan
(3)
Department of Mathematics, Payame Noor University of Khash
(4)
Department of Mathematics, University of Ulsan

References

  1. Ulam SM: Problems in Modern Mathematics, Chap. VI, Science edn. Wily, New York; 1940.Google Scholar
  2. Hyers DH: On the stability of the linear functional equation. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1941, 27: 222–224. 10.1073/pnas.27.4.222MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Aoki T: On the stability of the linear transformation in Banach spaces. J Math Soc Japan 1950, 2: 64–66. 10.2969/jmsj/00210064MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Rassias ThM: On the stability of the linear mapping in Banach spaces. Proc Am Math Soc 1978, 72: 297–300. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1978-0507327-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Cădariu L, Radu V: Fixed points and the stability of Jensen's functional equation. J Inequal Pure Appl Math 2003, 4(1):7. Art. ID 4MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. Diaz J, Margolis B: A fixed point theorem of the alternative for contractions on a generalized complete metric space. Bull Am Math Soc 1968, 74: 305–309. 10.1090/S0002-9904-1968-11933-0MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Isac G, Rassias ThM: Stability of ψ -additive mappings: appications to nonlinear analysis. Int J Math Math Sci 1996, 19: 219–228. 10.1155/S0161171296000324MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Cădariu L, Radu V: On the stability of the Cauchy functional equation: a fixed point approach. Grazer Math Ber 2004, 346: 43–52.Google Scholar
  9. Cădariu L, Radu V: Fixed point methods for the generalized stability of functional equations in a single variable. Fixed Point Theory and Applications 2008, 2008: 15. Art. ID 749392Google Scholar
  10. Park C: Fixed points and Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of Cauchy-Jensen functional equations in Banach algebras. Fixed Point Theory and Applications 2007, 2007: 15. Art. ID 50175View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Park C: Generalized Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of quadratic functional equations: a fixed point approach. Fixed Point Theory and Applications 2008, 2008: 9. Art. ID 493751Google Scholar
  12. Radu V: The fixed point alternative and the stability of functional equations. Fixed Point Theory 2003, 4: 91–96.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. Katsaras AK: Fuzzy topological vector spaces II. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1984, 12: 143–154. 10.1016/0165-0114(84)90034-4MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Felbin C: Finite dimensional fuzzy normed linear spaces. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1992, 48: 239–248. 10.1016/0165-0114(92)90338-5MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Krishna SV, Sarma KKM: Separation of fuzzy normed linear spaces. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1994, 63: 207–217. 10.1016/0165-0114(94)90351-4MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Mirmostafaee AK, Mirzavaziri M, Moslehian MS: Fuzzy stability of the Jensen functional equation. Fuzzy Sets Syst 2008, 159: 730–738. 10.1016/j.fss.2007.07.011MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Mirmostafaee AK, Moslehian MS: Fuzzy versions of Hyers-Ulam-Rassias theorem. Fuzzy Sets Syst 2008, 159: 720–729. 10.1016/j.fss.2007.09.016MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Mirmostafaee AK, Moslehian MS: Fuzzy approximately cubic mappings. Inf Sci 2008, 178: 3791–3798. 10.1016/j.ins.2008.05.032MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Park C: Fuzzy stability of additive functional inequalities with the fixed point alternative. J Inequal Appl 2009, 2009: 17. Art. ID 410576Google Scholar
  20. Xiao JZ, Zhu XH: Fuzzy normed spaces of opeators and its completeness. Fuzzy Sets Syst 2003, 133: 389–399. 10.1016/S0165-0114(02)00274-9MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Bag T, Samanta SK: Finite dimensional fuzzy normed linear space. J Fuzzy Math 2003, 11: 687–705.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. Cheng SC, Mordeson JM: Fuzzy linear operators and fuuzy normed linear spaces. Cacutta Math Soc 1994, 86: 429–436.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. Kramosil I, Michalek J: Fuzzy metric and statistical metric spaces. Kybernetica 1975, 11: 326–334.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. Bag T, Samanta SK: Fuzzy bounded linear operators. Fuzzy Set Syst 2005, 151: 513–547. 10.1016/j.fss.2004.05.004MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Miheţ D, Radu V: On the stability of the additive Cauchy functional equation in random normed spaces. J Math Anal Appl 2008, 343: 567–572. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.01.100MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Park C: Homomorphisms between Poisson JC *-algebras. Bull Braz Math Soc 2005, 36: 79–97. 10.1007/s00574-005-0029-zMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Park et al; licensee Springer. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.