Skip to main content

Theory and Modern Applications

Approximate perfect differential equations of second order

Abstract

In this paper we prove the Hyers-Ulam stability of the perfect linear differential equation f(t) y ″ (t)+ f 1 (t) y ′ (t)+ f 2 (t)y(t)=Q(t), where f,y∈ C 2 [a,b], Q∈C[a,b], f 2 (t)= f 1 ′ (t)− f ″ (t) and −∞<a<b<+∞.

MSC:34K20, 26D10, 39B82, 34K06, 39B72.

1 Introduction

The question concerning the stability of group homomorphisms was posed by Ulam [1]. Hyers [2] solved the case of approximately additive mappings in Banach spaces and T.M. Rassias generalized the result of Hyers [3].

Definition 1.1 Let X be a normed space over a scalar field and let I be an open interval. Assume that a 0 , a 1 ,…, a n , h:I→K are continuous functions. We say that the differential equation

a n (t) y ( n ) (t)+ a n − 1 (t) y ( n − 1 ) (t)+⋯+ a 1 (t) y ′ (t)+ a 0 (t)y(t)+h(t)=0
(1.1)

has the Hyers-Ulam stability if, for any function f:I→X satisfying the differential inequality

∥ a n ( t ) y ( n ) ( t ) + a n − 1 ( t ) y ( n − 1 ) ( t ) + ⋯ + a 1 ( t ) y ′ ( t ) + a 0 y ( t ) + h ( t ) ∥ ≤ε

for all t∈I and some ε≥0, there exists a solution g:I→X of (1.1) such that ∥f(t)−g(t)∥≤K(ε) for all t∈I, where K(ε) is a function depending only on ε.

Obłoza [4, 5] was the first author who investigated the Hyers-Ulam stability of differential equations (also see [6]).

Jung [7] solved the inhomogeneous differential equation of the form y ″ +2x y ′ −2ny= ∑ m = 0 ∞ a m x m , where n is a positive integer, and he used this result to prove the Hyers-Ulam stability of the differential equation y ″ +2x y ′ −2ny=0 in a special class of analytic functions.

Li and Shen [8] proved that if the characteristic equation λ 2 +αλ+β=0 has two different positive roots, then the linear differential equation of second order with constant coefficients y ″ (x)+α y ′ (x)+βy(x)=f(x) has the Hyers-Ulam stability where y∈ C 2 [a,b], f∈C[a,b] and −∞<a<b<+∞ (see also [9, 10]). Abdollahpour and Najati [11] proved that the third-order differential equation y ( 3 ) (t)+α y ″ (t)+β y ′ (t)+γy(t)=f(t) has the Hyers-Ulam stability. Ghaemi et al. [12] proved the Hyers-Ulam stability of the exact second-order linear differential equation

p 0 (x) γ ″ + p 1 (x) γ ′ + p 2 (x)γ+f(x)=0

with p 0 ″ (x)− p 1 ′ (x)+ p 2 (x)=0. Here p 0 , p 1 , p 2 , f:(a,b)→R are continuous functions. For more results about the Hyers-Ulam stability of differential equations, we can refer to [13–21].

Definition 1.2 We say that the differential equation

f(t) y ″ (t)+ f 1 (t) y ′ (t)+ f 2 (t)y(t)=Q(t),
(1.2)

is perfect if it can be written as d d t [f(t) y ′ (t)+( f 1 (t)− f ′ (t))y(t)]=Q(t).

It is clear that the differential equation (1.2) is perfect if and only if f 2 (t)= f 1 ′ (t)− f ″ (t). The aim of this paper is to investigate the Hyers-Ulam stability of the perfect differential equation (1.2), where f,y∈ C 2 [a,b], Q∈C[a,b], f 1 ∈ C 1 [a,b], f 2 (t)= f 1 ′ (t)− f ″ (t) and −∞<a<b<+∞. More precisely, we prove that the equation (1.2) has the Hyers-Ulam stability.

2 Hyers-Ulam stability of the perfect differential equation f(t) y ″ (t)+ f 1 (t) y ′ (t)+ f 2 (t)y(t)=Q(t)

In the following theorem, we prove the Hyers-Ulam stability of the differential equation (1.2).

Throughout this section, a and b are real numbers with −∞<a<b<+∞.

Theorem 2.1 The perfect differential equation

f(t) y ″ (t)+ f 1 (t) y ′ (t)+ f 2 (t)y(t)=Q(t)

has the Hyers-Ulam stability, where f,y∈ C 2 [a,b], f 1 ∈ C 1 [a,b], Q∈C[a,b] and f(t)≠0 for all t∈[a,b].

Proof Let ε>0 and y∈ C 2 [a,b] with

| f ( t ) y ″ ( t ) + f 1 ( t ) y ′ ( t ) + f 2 ( t ) y ( t ) − Q ( t ) | ⩽ε.

Let g(t)=f(t) y ′ +( f 1 (t)− f ′ (t))y for all t∈[a,b]. It is clear that

| g ′ ( t ) − Q ( t ) | = | f ( t ) y ″ ( t ) + f 1 ( t ) y ′ ( t ) + f 2 ( t ) y ( t ) − Q ( t ) | ⩽ε.

We define

z(x)=g(b)− ∫ x b Q(t)dt,x∈[a,b].

Then

z ′ (x)=Q(x),x∈[a,b].
(2.1)

Also, we have

| z ( x ) − g ( x ) | = | g ( b ) − g ( x ) − ∫ x b Q ( t ) d t | = | ∫ x b g ′ ( t ) d t − ∫ x b Q ( t ) d t | ⩽ ∫ x b | g ′ ( t ) − Q ( t ) | d t ⩽ ε ( b − a )

for all x∈[a,b]. Now we define

F(x)= 1 f ( x ) exp { ∫ a x f 1 ( t ) f ( t ) d t } ,u(x)= y ( b ) F ( b ) F ( x ) − 1 F ( x ) ∫ x b z ( t ) F ( t ) f ( t ) dt

for all x∈[a,b]. It is clear that u∈ C 2 [a,b] and

u ′ (x)F(x)+u(x) F ′ (x)= z ( x ) F ( x ) f ( x ) , F ′ (x)= f 1 ( x ) − f ′ ( x ) f ( x ) F(x).

Therefore,

f(x) u ′ (x)+ [ f 1 ( x ) − f ′ ( x ) ] u(x)=z(x),x∈[a,b].
(2.2)

Hence, (2.1) implies that

f(x) u ″ (x)+ f 1 (x) u ′ (x)+ f 2 (x)u(x)=Q(x),x∈[a,b].

Also, we have

| y ( x ) − u ( x ) | = | y ( x ) − y ( b ) F ( b ) F ( x ) + 1 F ( x ) ∫ x b z ( t ) F ( t ) f ( t ) d t | = 1 | F ( x ) | | y ( x ) F ( x ) − y ( b ) F ( b ) + ∫ x b z ( t ) F ( t ) f ( t ) d t | = 1 | F ( x ) | | ∫ x b z ( t ) F ( t ) f ( t ) d t − ∫ x b [ y ( t ) F ( t ) ] ′ d t | = 1 | F ( x ) | | ∫ x b ( z ( t ) F ( t ) f ( t ) − y ′ ( t ) F ( t ) − y ( t ) F ′ ( t ) ) d t | = 1 | F ( x ) | | ∫ x b F ( t ) ( z ( t ) f ( t ) − y ′ ( t ) − f 1 ( t ) − f ′ ( t ) f ( t ) y ( t ) ) d t | ⩽ 1 | F ( x ) | ∫ x b | F ( t ) f ( t ) | | z ( t ) − y ′ ( t ) f ( t ) − [ f 1 ( t ) − f ′ ( t ) ] y ( t ) | d t = 1 | F ( x ) | ∫ x b | F ( t ) f ( t ) | | z ( t ) − g ( t ) | d t ⩽ ε ( b − a ) 1 | F ( x ) | ∫ x b | F ( t ) f ( t ) | d t
(2.3)

for all x∈[a,b]. Since f 1 f ∈C[a,b], there exist constants m ′ and M ′ such that m ′ ⩽ f 1 ( x ) f ( x ) ⩽ M ′ . Thus

{ 1 ⩽ exp { ∫ a x f 1 ( t ) f ( t ) d t } ⩽ e M ′ ( b − a ) if  m ′ ≥ 0 ; e m ′ ( b − a ) ⩽ exp { ∫ a x f 1 ( t ) f ( t ) d t } ⩽ e M ′ ( b − a ) if  m ′ < 0 ⩽ M ′ ; e m ′ ( b − a ) ⩽ exp { ∫ a x f 1 ( t ) f ( t ) d t } ⩽ 1 if  M ′ < 0
(2.4)

for all x∈[a,b]. Since f∈C[a,b] and |f|>0, there exist constants 0<m⩽M such that m⩽|f(x)|⩽M for all x∈[a,b]. Hence, (2.4) implies that

1 M e | m ′ | ( a − b ) ⩽ | F ( x ) | ⩽ 1 m e | M ′ | ( b − a )

for all x∈[a,b]. It follows from (2.3) that

| y ( x ) − u ( x ) | ⩽ ε ( b − a ) 1 | F ( x ) | ∫ x b | F ( t ) f ( t ) | d t ⩽ ε ( b − a ) 2 M m 2 e ( | m ′ | + | M ′ | ) ( b − a )

for all x∈[a,b]. □

References

  1. Ulam SM: Problems in Modern Mathematics. Wiley, New York; 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hyers DH: On the stability of the linear functional equation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1941, 27: 222–224. 10.1073/pnas.27.4.222

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Rassias TM: On the stability of linear mapping in Banach spaces. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1978, 72: 297–300. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1978-0507327-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Obłoza M: Hyers stability of the linear differential equation. Rocznik Nauk.-Dydakt. Prace Mat. 1993, 13: 259–270.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Obłoza M: Connections between Hyers and Lyapunov stability of the ordinary differential equations. Rocznik Nauk.-Dydakt. Prace Mat. 1997, 14: 141–146.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Alsina C, Ger R: On some inequalities and stability results related to the exponential function. J. Inequal. Appl. 1998, 2: 373–380.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Jung S:Hyers-Ulam stability of differential equation y ″ +2x y ′ −2ny=0. J. Inequal. Appl. 2010., 2010: Article ID 793197

    Google Scholar 

  8. Li Y, Shen Y: Hyers-Ulam stability of linear differential equations of second order. Appl. Math. Lett. 2010, 23: 306–309. 10.1016/j.aml.2009.09.020

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Eshaghi Gordji M, Cho Y, Ghaemi MB, Alizadeh B: Stability of the exact second order partial differential equations. J. Inequal. Appl. 2011., 2011: Article ID 306275

    Google Scholar 

  10. Najati, A, Abdollahpour, MR, Cho, Y: Superstability of linear differential equations of second order. Preprint

  11. Abdollahpour MR, Najati A: Stability of linear differential equations of third order. Appl. Math. Lett. 2011, 24: 1827–1830. 10.1016/j.aml.2011.04.043

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Ghaemi MB, Eshaghi Gordji M, Alizadeh B, Park C: Hyers-Ulam stability of exact second order linear differential equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2012., 2012: Article ID 36

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gavruta P, Jung S, Li Y: Hyers-Ulam stability for second-order linear differential equations with boundary conditions. Electron. J. Differ. Equ. 2011, 2011(80):1–5.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Jung S: Hyers-Ulam stability of linear differential equations of first order. Appl. Math. Lett. 2004, 17: 1135–1140. 10.1016/j.aml.2003.11.004

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Jung S: Hyers-Ulam stability of linear differential equations of first order, III. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2005, 311: 139–146. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.02.025

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Jung S: Hyers-Ulam stability of linear differential equations of first order, II. Appl. Math. Lett. 2006, 19: 854–858. 10.1016/j.aml.2005.11.004

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Miura T: On the Hyers-Ulam stability of a differentiable map. Sci. Math. Jpn. 2002, 55: 17–24.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Miura T, Miyajima S, Takahasi SE: Hyers-Ulam stability of linear differential operators with constant coefficients. Math. Nachr. 2003, 258: 90–96. 10.1002/mana.200310088

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Miura T, Jung S, Takahasi SE:Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of the Banach space valued differential equations y ′ =λy. J. Korean Math. Soc. 2004, 41: 995–1005. 10.4134/JKMS.2004.41.6.995

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Popa D, Rasa I: On the Hyers-Ulam stability of the differential equation. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2011, 381: 530–537. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2011.02.051

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Popa D, Rasa I: On the Hyers-Ulam stability of the differential operator with nonconstant coefficients. Appl. Math. Comput. 2012, 219: 1562–1568. 10.1016/j.amc.2012.07.056

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

CP was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (NRF-2012R1A1A2004299) and DYS was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (NRF-2010-0021792).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong Yun Shin.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

All authors conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, drafted the manuscript, participated in the sequence alignment, and read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abdollahpour, M.R., Najati, A., Park, C. et al. Approximate perfect differential equations of second order. Adv Differ Equ 2012, 225 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2012-225

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2012-225

Keywords