Open Access

Fractional Models for Thermal Modeling and Temperature Estimation of a Transistor Junction

  • Jocelyn Sabatier1Email author,
  • HuyCuong Nguyen1, 2,
  • Christophe Farges1,
  • Jean-Yves Deletage3,
  • Xavier Moreau1,
  • Franck Guillemard2 and
  • Bernard Bavoux2
Advances in Difference Equations20112011:687363

DOI: 10.1155/2011/687363

Received: 11 December 2010

Accepted: 20 January 2011

Published: 21 March 2011

Abstract

The thermal behavior of a power transistor mounted on a dissipator is considered in order to estimate the transistor temperature junction using a measure of the dissipator temperature only. The thermal transfers between the electric power applied to the transistor, the junction temperature, and the dissipator temperature are characterized by two fractional transfer functions. These models are then used in a Control Output Observer (COO) to estimate the transistor junction temperature.

1. Introduction

Fractional differentiation has been widely used in the modelling of many physical and chemical processes and engineering systems such as electrochemistry and diffusion waves, electromagnetic waves, fractal electrical networks, electrical machines, nanotechnology, viscoelastic materials and systems, quantum evolution of complex systems [1], and heat conduction [2].

Automatic control is also a field in which many applications of fractional differentiations has been proposed. Recently, the authors have demonstrated that the real state of a fractional order system is not exactly observable [3]. However, they also have demonstrated that the pseudostate vector of the pseudostate space description (also defined in this paper) can be estimated using a Luenberger like observer.

In this paper, this theory is applied to the estimation of the junction temperature of a power transistor. Temperature management and control are among the most critical functions in power electronic devices, as operating temperature and thermal cycling can affect device performance and reliability. Transistor junction temperature estimation is a problem that was several times addressed in the literature. However, some of the proposed methods are open loop estimations [4], or cannot be implemented on-line due to the complex model used [5, 6] or also require additional devices [7].

In this paper, a simple fractional model is used to evaluate on-line the transistor junction temperature. The considered transistors are fitted with protection diodes that are used in a preliminary study and after their characterisations as a junction temperature sensor. This substitution sensor is used to characterise the transistor mounted on a dissipator by two transfer functions. The first one links the electric power applied to the transistor to its junction temperature and the second one links the junction temperature to the sensor temperature. Given the link existing between diffusion-based systems and fractional systems, the transfer functions obtained are fractional with orders multiples of 0.5 [2]. These transfer functions are then used to derive a pseudostate space description in which the junction temperature and the dissipator temperature are pseudostate variables. An observer based on a dynamic feedback of the real dissipator temperature is used to estimate the junction temperature.

2. Preliminaries

A multiinput, multioutput fractional system is described by the differential equation system involving fractional derivatives of the system input https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq1_HTML.gif and of the system output https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq2_HTML.gif :
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_Equ1_HTML.gif
(2.1)

in which https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq3_HTML.gif and https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq4_HTML.gif . https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq5_HTML.gif and https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq6_HTML.gif denote fractional differentiation operators of orders https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq7_HTML.gif and https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq8_HTML.gif , respectively. Such operators are defined in [811] and a detailed survey of the properties linked to these definitions can be found in [8].

If orders https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq9_HTML.gif and https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq10_HTML.gif verify relations https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq11_HTML.gif , https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq12_HTML.gif , https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq13_HTML.gif , then differentiation orders https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq14_HTML.gif and https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq15_HTML.gif are commensurate [12] (multiple of the same rational number https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq16_HTML.gif ).

Using order commensurability condition and for zero initial conditions, differential equation (2.1) admits a pseudostate space representation of the form:
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_Equ2_HTML.gif
(2.2)

where https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq17_HTML.gif is the pseudostate vector, https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq18_HTML.gif is the fractional order of the system, and https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq19_HTML.gif , https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq20_HTML.gif , https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq21_HTML.gif , and https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq22_HTML.gif are constant matrices.

As explained in [3], representation (2.2) is not strictly a state space representation and this is why it is denoted in the sequel pseudostate space representation. In the usual integer order system theory, the state of the system, https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq23_HTML.gif , known at any given time point, along with the system equations and system inputs, is sufficient to predict the response of the system. That comment can be found in [13].

As demonstrated in [3], and whatever the fractional derivative definition used (excepted Caputo's definition but this last one is not physically acceptable [14]), the value of vector https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq24_HTML.gif at initial time https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq25_HTML.gif in (2.2) is not enough to predict the future behavior of the system. Vector https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq26_HTML.gif in (2.2) is thus not a state vector of the system. However, as also shown in [3], a Luenberger type observer can be used to estimate pseudostate vector https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq27_HTML.gif .

3. Experimental System Description

Ten BUK 552 transistors have been used in this study. As shown on the component internal description of Figure 1, a protection diode is associated to the MOSFET transistor.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

BUK 552 transistor internal description.

A preliminary study of the forward characteristic protection diode of these transistors has demonstrated that the diodes can be used as temperature sensors. As shown in Figure 2, for the same temperature, the forward voltage for a 25 mA current is quasiconstant. But as shown in Figure 3, this voltage varies with temperature.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Ten transistors protection diode forward characteristics.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Protection diode forward characteristics for ten temperatures from 20°C (curve on the right) to 120°C (curve on the left) with an increment between 10 and 20°C.

One can thus conclude that the protection diode in the considered transistors can be used as a temperature sensor through the measure of its forward drop when a forward current of 25 mA is applied.

To exploit this property the electrical system of Figure 4 was built.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Electrical system used.

This electrical system permits to characterize the protection diode forward characteristic and to apply a current to the transistor to heat it. The two switches https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq28_HTML.gif and https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq29_HTML.gif and the transistor grid are controlled by a laptop, a National Instruments I/O card and a Virtual Instrument designed for the experiment. With such a system, the following operations are performed.

(i)Protection diode forward characterization is obtained by switching off https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq30_HTML.gif and https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq31_HTML.gif . Forward current is measured through the shunt resistor https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq32_HTML.gif and forward voltage— https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq33_HTML.gif is measured at the transistor terminals.

(ii)Transistor on-state operation is obtained by switching on https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq34_HTML.gif and https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq35_HTML.gif ; transistor on-state current is measured through the difference of the voltage at the shunt resistors https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq36_HTML.gif and https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq37_HTML.gif terminals. https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq38_HTML.gif voltage is also measured.

As shown in Figure 5 and during the tests, the ten transistors are mounted on a dissipator (aluminum plate). The dissipator temperature is measured by a type K thermocouple glued on the plate.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Transistor mounted on a dissipator.

4. System Modeling

Two transfer functions have been used to characterize the system constituted by the transistor mounted on a dissipator. As shown on Figure 6, the first one links the electrical power applied to the transistor https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq39_HTML.gif to the junction temperature https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq40_HTML.gif , and the second one links the junction temperature https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq41_HTML.gif to the dissipator temperature https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq42_HTML.gif . These two transfer functions are denoted https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq43_HTML.gif and https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq44_HTML.gif , respectively.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_Fig6_HTML.jpg
Figure 6

System model.

It was shown in [2] that fractional system with orders equal to 0.5 are well adapted to model thermal-diffusion-based systems. https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq45_HTML.gif and https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq46_HTML.gif transfer functions are supposed of the form:
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_Equ3_HTML.gif
(4.1)
To obtain the numerical values associated to these transfer functions a Pseudo-Random Binary Sequence (PRBS) is applied at the transistor grid. The sampling period of this PRBS is https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq47_HTML.gif  ms. This signal is interrupted each 2 s during 10 ms in order to measure the junction and the dissipator temperatures. This PRBS, represented on Figure 7, generates an electric power signal applied to the transistor.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_Fig7_HTML.jpg
Figure 7

Electrical power applied to the transistor and a zoom on this signal.

The PRBS generates the junction and dissipator temperatures evolutions, respectively represented on Figures 8 and 9.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_Fig8_HTML.jpg
Figure 8

Transistor junction temperature evolution.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_Fig9_HTML.jpg
Figure 9

Dissipator temperature evolution.

Coefficients of transfer functions https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq48_HTML.gif and https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq49_HTML.gif are identified using the identification module of the CRONE Matlab toolbox [15, 16]. Assuming that the fractional orders are imposed, a least square-based method can here be used. The obtained parameters are gathered in Table 1.
Table 1

Coefficients of transfer functions https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq50_HTML.gif and https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq51_HTML.gif .

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq52_HTML.gif

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq53_HTML.gif

 

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq54_HTML.gif

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq55_HTML.gif

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq56_HTML.gif

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq57_HTML.gif

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq58_HTML.gif

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq59_HTML.gif

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq60_HTML.gif

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq61_HTML.gif

 

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq62_HTML.gif

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq63_HTML.gif

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq64_HTML.gif

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq65_HTML.gif

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq66_HTML.gif

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq67_HTML.gif

5. Temperature Estimation

The Controller Output Observer (COO), used in this section has been developed by MARGOLIS at Davis University in California [17]. This observer has been mainly applied in the mechanical domain (estimator of torque, speed, etc.). Here, it is used to estimate the temperature of a MosFet junction using the temperature measurement of the dissipator only.

Given relation (4.1), one can write
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_Equ4_HTML.gif
(5.1)
A physical model of the system is supposed described by the relation
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_Equ5_HTML.gif
(5.2)

where https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq68_HTML.gif and https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq69_HTML.gif represent, respectively, an estimation of the dissipator and junction temperatures.

The COO provides an estimation of the system input by minimizing the error between model and system outputs through a controller of transfer functions https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq70_HTML.gif (see Figure 10). Such a minimization is mathematically described by
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_Equ6_HTML.gif
(5.3)
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_Fig10_HTML.jpg
Figure 10

Dynamic output feedback-based observer.

Using (5.1) and (5.2), into (5.3) leads to:
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_Equ7_HTML.gif
(5.4)
and thus
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_Equ8_HTML.gif
(5.5)
Relation (5.5) highlights that the estimation dynamics can be imposed by a convenient choice of the controller https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq71_HTML.gif . Here, a 1st-order dynamics is imposed for https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq72_HTML.gif estimation, namely
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_Equ9_HTML.gif
(5.6)
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq73_HTML.gif is the time-constant associated to the estimation dynamics. If relation (5.6) is overridden into (5.5) it is found that
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_Equ10_HTML.gif
(5.7)
Relation (5.7) shows that the estimation of https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq74_HTML.gif is based on the inversion of https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq75_HTML.gif transfer function. This estimator can thus be used only with a stable system with all its zeros in the left half complex plane (with the inversion the zeros of the system become the poles of the estimator and conversely). For its implementation in the scheme of Figure 10, transfer function https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq76_HTML.gif must be approximated by an integer transfer function. Here, an approximation based on a recursive distribution of poles and zero is used [18]. Figure 11 shows the poles and zeros of the approximation obtained and proves that all the poles and the zeros are in left half complex plane.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_Fig11_HTML.jpg
Figure 11

Poles, zeros map of https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq77_HTML.gif .

6. Implementation and Results

To evaluate the efficiency of the observer, the electrical power represented in Figure 12 is used as the input https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq78_HTML.gif in the real system of Figure 10.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_Fig12_HTML.jpg
Figure 12

Electrical power applied to the thermal system.

In Figure 13, the COO is started at time https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq79_HTML.gif  s in order to observe its convergence. The observer converges very quickly because the parameter https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq80_HTML.gif is chosen equal to 2s. On the other hand, due to the amplification of the measurement noises, the error oscillates within the interval https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq81_HTML.gif °C and never converges towards 0.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_Fig13_HTML.jpg
Figure 13

Comparison of the real temperature https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq82_HTML.gif with the estimated temperature and corresponding error.

An advantage of this estimator with respect to the traditional ones (Luenberger like for instance) is that it only requires one information to estimate the junction temperature https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq83_HTML.gif : the dissipator temperature https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F687363/MediaObjects/13662_2010_Article_65_IEq84_HTML.gif (no measure of the input).

7. Conclusion

In this paper, the efficiency of fractional models for thermal systems modeling is demonstrated through an application to transistor junction temperature estimation. Two fractional models are indeed used to represent the dynamic evolution of the junction temperature and of the dissipator temperature on which the transistor is mounted. These two models are then used to estimate a transistor junction temperature. Such a temperature diagnostic is really important on power electronic devices to optimize the heat management of IGBTs (Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor). This estimator provides information about junction temperature using a dynamic output feedback-based observer, with only a measure of the dissipator temperature. This limited number of required measures and the simple heat transfer fractional models obtained permit a simple and online implementation of the estimator. The estimator has been implemented and produces very accurate junction temperature estimation. Such an estimator should thus be used to monitor electronic systems such as motor controller, welding, DC/DC and AC/DC converters and to prevent damages in electronic systems on which the considered transistors (or similar components) are used.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
CRONE Team IMS Laboratory, CNRS UMR 5218, 351 cours de la Libération, Bordeaux 1 University
(2)
Direction de la Recherche et de l'Ingénierie Avancée, PSA Peugeot Citroën, Route de Gizy
(3)
POWER Team IMS Laboratory, CNRS UMR 5218, 351 Cours de la Libération, Bordeaux 1 University

References

  1. Sabatier J, Agrawal OP, Tenreiro Machado JA (Eds): Advances in Fractional Calculus, Theoretical Developments and Applications in Physics and Engineering. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands; 2007:xiv+552.MATH
  2. Sabatier J, Melchior P, Oustaloup A: A testing bench for fractional order systems education. Journal Europeen des Systemes Automatises 2008,42(6–8):839-861.View Article
  3. Sabatier J, Merveillaut M, Fenetau L, Oustaloup A: On observability of fractional order systems. Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (IDETC/CIE '09), 2009, San Diego, Calif, USA
  4. Musallamt M, Acarnley PP, Johnson CM, Pritchard L, Pickert V: Open loop real-time power electronic device junction temperature estimation. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (IEEE-ISlE '04), May 2004, Ajaccio, France 2: 1041-1046.
  5. Bruckner T, Bernet S: Estimation and measurement of junction temperatures in a three-level voltage source converter. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 2007,22(1):3-12.View Article
  6. Khatir Z, Dupont L, Ibrahim A: Investigations on junction temperature estimation based on junction voltage measurements. Microelectronics Reliability 2010,50(9–11):1506-1510.View Article
  7. Kim Y-S, Sul S-K: On-line estimation of IGBT junction temperature using on-state voltage drop. Proceedings of the 33rd IAS Annual Meeting, 1998 2: 853-859.
  8. Oldham KB, Spanier J: The Fractional Calculus; Theory and Applications of Differentiation and Integration to Arbitrary Order. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA; 1974:xiii+234. Mathematics in Science and Engineering, vol. 11MATH
  9. Samko SG, Kilbas AA, Marichev OI: Fractional Integrals and Derivatives: Theory and Applications. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Yverdon, Switzerland; 1993:xxxvi+976.MATH
  10. Miller KS, Ross B: An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations, A Wiley-Interscience Publication. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA; 1993:xvi+366.
  11. Podlubny I: Fractional Differential Equations, Mathematics in Science and Engineering. Volume 198. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA; 1999:xxiv+340.MATH
  12. Matignon D: Stability properties for generalized fractional differential systems. In Systèmes Différentiels Fractionnaires (Paris, 1998), ESAIM: Proceedings. Volume 5. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Paris, France; 1998:145-158.
  13. Lorenzo DF, Hartley TT: Initialization in fractional order systems. Proceedings of the European Control Conference (ECC '01), 2001, Porto, Portugal 1471-1476.
  14. Sabatier J, Merveillaut M, Malti R, Oustaloup A: How to impose physically coherent initial conditions to a fractional system? Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 2010,15(5):1318-1326. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.05.070MathSciNetView ArticleMATH
  15. Melchior P, Lanusse P: CRONE Toolbox : une boîte à outils Matlab pour les systèmes fractionnaires. In Colloque sur l'Enseignement des Technologies et des Sciences de l'Information (CETSIS-EEA '01), October 2001, Clermont-Ferrand, France Edited by: Dancla F, Cois O. 241-244.
  16. Melchior P, Lanusse P, Cois O, Dancla F: Crone Toolbox for Matlab: Fractional Systems Toolbox—Tutorial Workshop on "Fractional calculus applications in automatic control and robotics". Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC '02), December 2002, Las Vegas, Nev, USA
  17. Ozkan B, Margolis D, Pengov M: The controller output observer: Estimation of vehicle tire cornering and normal forces. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control 2008,130(6):-10.
  18. Oustaloup A: La Dérivation Non Entière: Théorie, Synthèse et Applications. Hermès, Paris, France; 1995.

Copyright

© Jocelyn Sabatier et al. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.