# Banded Matrices and Discrete Sturm-Liouville Eigenvalue Problems

- Werner Kratz
^{1}Email author

**2009**:362627

**DOI: **10.1155/2009/362627

© Werner Kratz. 2009

**Received: **31 August 2009

**Accepted: **19 November 2009

**Published: **5 January 2010

## Abstract

We consider eigenvalue problems for self-adjoint Sturm-Liouville difference equations of any even order. It is well known that such problems with *Dirichlet boundary conditions* can be transformed into an algebraic eigenvalue problem for a banded, real-symmetric matrix, and vice versa. In this article it is shown that such a transform exists for *general separated, self-adjoint boundary conditions* also. But the main result is an explicit procedure (algorithm) for the numerical computation of this banded, real-symmetric matrix. This construction can be used for numerical purposes, since in the recent paper by Kratz and Tentler (2008) there is given a stable and superfast algorithm to compute the eigenvalues of banded, real-symmetric matrices. Hence, the Sturm-Liouville problems considered here may now be treated by this algorithm.

## 1. Introduction

with Dirichlet boundary conditions is equivalent with an algebraic eigenvalue problem [2] for a symmetric, banded -matrix with bandwidth , where and are fixed integers with (see [1, Theorem 1, Remark 1(i)]). Note that (SL) is irrelevant for in the case of Dirichlet boundary conditions, so that in [1] equation (SL) is considered only for .

In this article we treat the Sturm-Liouville difference equations (SL) with *general separated, self-adjoint boundary conditions.* These boundary conditions include the so-called natural boundary conditions, when no or "not enough'' boundary conditions are imposed [3, page 51, equation (2.3.9)]. More precisely, given (SL) and the (imposed and natural) boundary conditions, then we show that this eigenvalue problem is equivalent with an algebraic eigenvalue problem for a real-symmetric, banded matrix with bandwidth
, and we will construct this matrix explicity. For our general boundary conditions we must assume that the coefficients
are unequal to zero at "the beginning and at the end'' (see (4.7) below). This leads via [4] or [5] to a numerical algorithm to compute the eigenvalues of these Sturm-Liouville eigenvalue problems.

Therefore the present paper is to some extent a continuation of the articles [1, 4]. The paper [4] presents superfast (i.e., with
numerical operations) and stable algorithms for the computation of some of the eigenvalues for a real-symmetric and banded
matrix with bandwidth
, where
or
for the most interesting division-free algorithms. These algorithms are based on the bisection method, and they generalize the well-known procedure for real-symmetric and *tridiagonal* matrices. As is shown in [1] and used in [4] the algebraic eigenvalue problems for real-symmetric, banded matrices with bandwidth
are equivalent to eigenvalue problems for self-adjoint Sturm-Liouville difference equations of order
with *Dirichlet boundary conditions.* Hence, these discrete Sturm-Liouville eigenvalue problems can be treated by those algorithms.

Summarizing, *the main goal* of this article is to provide an algorithm to calculate some of the eigenvalues of eigenvalue problems for self-adjoint Sturm-Liouville difference equations with *general separated, self-adjoint boundary conditions* (and not only for Dirichlet conditions as in [4, 5]). To be more precise, we provide a construction to transform these eigenvalue problems into such eigenvalue problems with Dirichlet boundary conditions. This construction incorporates "somehow'' the general boundary conditions into the first and last
equations of the Sturm-Liouville difference equations. These transformations are stable (using essentially orthogonal transforms) and the required computational work depends on
only (most interesting
) but not on
, so that the overall combined (with [4]) algorithm remains superfast (i.e., O(
) numerical operations) and stable. Hence, the results of this paper are of interest mainly for numerical applications.

- (i)
*deriving the transform*to an explicit algebraic algebraic eigenvalue problem for a symmetric, banded matrix with bandwidth , - (ii)
*providing the required formulas*, so that an*implementation*of the construction is easily "accessible'' for the reader, - (iii)
*proving*that the construction is always successful under the conditions (4.4) and (4.7) (which is the contents of Theorem 6.1).

This means that Sections 2 to 5 have to be quite technical. Our proceeding in these sections provides simultaneously *the construction, the derivation, and the proof that the construction always works.*

As already said the asserted equivalence in Theorem 6.1 is not the crucial result of this article. Actually, under the assumptions (4.4) and (4.7) this equivalence may be shown quite easily using Lemma 2.3 and Proposition 3.2. Moreover, assumption (4.4) is necessary and sufficient for self-adjointness (see, e.g., [3, Proposition 2.1.1] or elsewhere), if (4.7) holds. The assumption (4.7) is also necessary for *all considered boundary conditions simultaneously*, but for a particular boundary condition it may be weakened. But this can be seen during the procedure. The equivalence via Lemma 2.3 and Proposition 3.2 directly leads in general to a banded symmetric matrix with larger bandwidth. On the other hand the "minimal bandwidth'' tridiagonal (i.e.,
) can always be achieved in a stable way by the well-known methods of Givens and Householder, but these algorithms require
numerical operations as discussed in [4], which would make our whole approach obsolete.

Note that our main goal is equivalence to an "ordinary'' algebraic eigenvalue problem for a real-symmetric and banded matric rather than to some *matrix pencil* or *generalized eigenvalue problem* of the form
. This is so, because the algorithm via bisection works only for these algebraic eigenvalue problems, which are well posed, while those general problems are in general not well posed. Note also that the equivalence to "some matrix pencil'' can be seen immediately from (SL) or (4.1) and also (4.2). Moreover, the *reduction of separated boundary conditions to Dirichlet boundary conditions* via an extension of the system to a larger interval is also well known for discrete Hamiltonian or symplectic systems (see, e.g., [6] or [7]). Hence, this reduction combined with the transformation of the Sturm-Liouville equations (SL) to a linear Hamiltonian system by Lemma 2.2 would also lead to a problem with Dirichlet boundary conditions but for a *larger matrix*, more precisely, it would lead to some *matrix pencil* (possible also with larger bandwidth), which cannot be treated by the algorithms of [4, 5].

The discussion of assumption (4.7) in the *Concluding Remarks* of Section 6 does not focus on the necessity or sufficiency of it. It is quite "natural'' to assume that the leading coefficient
never vanishes, because it is the case in most applications. But the main point is that the incorporation of our general boundary conditions into the the difference equations by our construction leads in general to problems with Dirichlet boundary conditions, but where the leading coefficient may vanish for some
's at the beginning and the end. Therefore, algorithms via corresponding Hamiltonian or Riccati equations cannot be used anymore, so that the *division-free algorithms* (i.e., no divisions by
) are needed as remarked in Concluding Remarks (i) of Section 6.

Let us shortly *motivate* why to consider the discrete Sturm-Liouville eigenvalue problems of this article, particularly for
and
, and for general boundary conditions.

- (i)
of higher order leads to a banded matrix with bandwidth with , and then even Dirichlet boundary conditions lead for the discrete problem to the boundary conditions , which have to be complemented by additional "natural boundary conditions'' in the usual way. Therefore, such problems of second order with Dirichlet boundary conditions cannot be treated (at least for higher-order discretization) directly by the algorithm of [4]. By using the construction of this article we obtain faster algorithms than the known ones.

- (ii)
Linear discretization of th- and th-order Sturm-Liouville difference equations leads to bandwidths and , and the numerical treatment of Dirichlet boundary conditions via [4] requires also the construction of this article.

Let us shortly discuss the setup of this paper. In the next section we provide the formulae, which transform the difference equations (SL) into the corresponding matrix equation (see Lemma 2.1 below) based on [1]. In Section 3 we derive via partial summation the so-called Dirichlet's formula, which yields the crucial identities (3.3). In Section 4 we formulate our discrete Sturm-Liouville eigenvalue problems. In particular, we introduce (based on [8]) and discuss shortly the corresponding *general separated, self-adjoint boundary conditions*. In Section 5 we carry out our *construction* of the symmetric, banded matrix, so that the corresponding algebraic eigenvalue problem is equivalent with our Sturm-Liouville problem. Hence, our proceeding in Sections 2 to 5 provides simultaneously *the construction, the derivation, and the proof that the construction always works*. This is formulated as our main result in the last Section 6 by adding some concluding remarks.

## 2. Discrete Sturm-Liouville Difference Equations, Banded Matrices, and Hamiltonian Systems

This formula yields the following.

Lemma 2.1.

Next, we have by [1, Lemma 3] or [9, Remark 2] the following.

Lemma 2.2.

For the next lemma; see, for example, [10, formulae ( 6) and ( 9)] for the case of constant coefficients. It follows easily from our formulae (2.4) and (2.9) by computing the finite differences via .

Lemma 2.3.

## 3. Dirichlet's Formula

The next lemma is a discrete version of the continuous Dirichlet's formula [3, Lemma 8.4.3].

Lemma 3.1.

Proof.

which proves our assertion (3.1) using also the definition of and by Lemma 2.2.

Proposition 3.2.

Proof.

because is symmetric by Lemma 2.1. This yields our assertion (3.3).

## 4. Discrete Sturm-Liouville Eigenvalue Problems with Separated, Self-Adjoint Boundary Conditions

We assume this from now on.

The self-adjointness of follows from general theory of linear Hamiltonian difference systems [11], and from the equivalence of our difference equation (4.1) with such systems, which is stated in Lemma 2.2. In addition, the self-adjointness of the boundary conditions via the assumption (4.4) is stated or discussed, for example, in [3, Definition 2.1.2], [8, Remark 2(iii)], [12, Proposition 2], or [7, Definition 1].

## 5. Construction of the Symmetric, Banded Matrix

As a result we will obtain an algebraic eigenvalue problem for a symmetric, banded matrix of size with integers depending on the boundary conditions. This algebraic eigenvalue problem will be equivalent with our given Sturm-Liouville eigenvalue problem from Section 4 under the assumptions (4.4) and (4.7).

### 5.1. Boundary Conditions at the Beginning

*spectral theorem*[13] an orthogonal matrix such that

*block structure*from now on including the extreme cases and , where the zero-matrices or do not occur. By the

*Gram-Schmidt process*(or QR-factorization [13]), there exists an orthogonal matrix such that is

*lower triangular*, where with the blockstructure above, that is, . Then is orthogonal, and

is symmetric. Hence, , because is invertible, and , so that is invertible.

so that is lower triangular, and where is orthogonal.

We say that (5.18) is the boundary conditions in *normalized form.*

*first*

*equations*or the first block row of our difference equations (4.1) or (5.1), that is, by Lemma 2.1 and (5.2),

*defines*independently of , which was free by (5.18). Note that is symmetric, because and are symmetric by Lemma 2.1 and (5.7). Moreover, is lower triangular by (C2), so that (5.23) leads to bandwidth and symmetry. More precisely, we drop the first columns of , and the first rows are replaced by the following rows, which constitute the

*first*

*rows of the symmetric, banded matrix under construction*:

*next*

*rows*from of our matrix under construction have to be defined by

This completes the construction concerning the boundary conditions at the beginning. Thus, possible *eigenvectors* have to be of the form
, where the boundary conditions are satisfied by putting
and defining
and
by (5.18) and (5.22), respectively.

### 5.2. Boundary Conditions at the End

We proceed similarly as in the previous subsection. Therefore, we can skip some details. We shall use for convenience the same notation for auxiliary matrices or vectors here, but of course, with a different meaning. Observe that the situation is nevertheless *not symmetric* (see the concluding remarks (ii) below).

*upper triangular*, where with the blockstructure above, that is, . Then is orthogonal, and

By (5.5) and (C5) we obtain that and that is invertible.

so that is upper triangular, and where is orthogonal.

with
,
,
, and
remaining free. We say that (5.34) is the boundary conditions (at the end) in *normalized form.*

*last*

*equations*of our difference equations (4.1) or (5.1), that is, by Lemma 2.1 and (5.2),

*defines*independently of , which was free by (5.34). Note that is symmetric, because is symmetric by Lemma 2.1 and because is symmetric by (C6). Moreover, is upper triangular by (C6), so that (5.39) leads to bandwidth and symmetry. More precisely, we drop the last columns of , and the last rows are replaced by the following rows, which constitute the

*last*

*rows of the symmetric, banded matrix under construction*:

## 6. Main Result and Concluding Remarks

Altogether we have shown by the construction of Section 5 the following result.

Theorem 6.1.

Assume (4.4) and (4.7). Then the construction of Section 5 transforms the Sturm-Liouville eigenvalue problem (given by (4.1) and (4.2)) of Section 4 into an equivalent algebraic eigenvalue problem for a real-symmetric, banded matrix with bandwidth . This matrix is of size with given by (5.10) and (5.28), and it is constructed from (defined by (5.2)) by (C1)–(C8).

- (i)
By our

*theorem*every discrete Sturm-Liouville eigenvalue problem is equivalent with an algebraic eigenvalue problem for a banded, symmetric matrix under the assumptions (4.4) and (4.7). On the other hand, by [1, Remark 1(i)], such an algebraic eigenvalue problem is equivalent with a discrete Sturm-Liouville eigenvalue problem with*Dirichlet boundary conditions.*Moreover, if for all , then our eigenvalue problem can be written as an eigenvalue problem for a corresponding Hamiltonian system or symplectic system [14] according to Lemma 2.2. Note that it is quite*natural*to assume that the leading coefficient never vanishes, because it is the case in most applications. But the main point is that the incorporation of our general boundary conditions into the difference equations by our construction leads in general to a problem where the leading coefficient may vanish for some 's at the beginning and the end. To be more precise, our construction may cause that matrix elements become zero at the beginning and at the end, so that its equivalent Sturm-Liouville problem with Dirichlet boundary conditions will*not satisfy*for all anymore, because by (2.3). Hence, it cannot be written as an eigenvalue problem for a linear Hamiltonian difference system, so that the corresponding recursion formulae (based on the Hamiltonian or associated Riccati difference system [4, 11]) cannot be applied for numerical purposes as in [4, Theorems A and 2]. Therefore, divisions by must be avoided, which is done by the division-free algorithms presented in [4, 5]. Hence, these*division-free algorithms*are crucial for our purposes. - (ii)
Note that in contrast to the corresponding

*continuous*Sturm-Liouville problems (or the corresponding Hamiltonian differential systems), there is*no symmetry*with respect to the endpoints in the discrete case. This is quite obvious by the difference equation (4.1) with forward differences. Therefore the treatment of the boundary conditions at the endpoints in the subsections above had to be done separately. Actually the results of this treatment are quite different as can be seen also from the next remark. - (iii)
We discuss the

*extreme cases*or of our construction. It follows from (5.10) and (5.28) that if and only if is invertible, that is, by (4.5) (this includes*Dirichlet conditions*for ).if and only if , that is, by (4.5) (so that or is

*free*). if and only if or is invertible, that is, by (4.6) or by (4.3) (this includes*natural boundary conditions*for ). if and only if , that is, (*Dirichlet conditions*).

Hence, our construction leads to the *maximal size*
(i.e.,
) of the constructed matrix for Dirichlet conditions
(more general for
) at the beginning and for natural boundary conditions (more general for
) at the end. The construction leads to the *minimal size*
for
(or for free
) at the beginning and for Dirichlet conditions
at the end.

## Declarations

### Acknowledgment

This research is supported by Grant KR 1157/2-1 of DFG.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Kratz W:
**Banded matrices and difference equations.***Linear Algebra and Its Applications*2001,**337**(1–3):1–20.MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Wilkinson JH:
*The Algebraic Eigenvalue Problem*. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK; 1965:xviii+662.MATHGoogle Scholar - Kratz W:
*Quadratic Functionals in Variational Analysis and Control Theory, Mathematical Topics*.*Volume 6*. Akademie, Berlin, Germany; 1995:293.Google Scholar - Kratz W, Tentler M:
**Recursion formulae for the characteristic polynomial of symmetric banded matrices.***Linear Algebra and Its Applications*2008,**428**(11–12):2482–2500. 10.1016/j.laa.2007.11.024MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Tentler M:
*Rekursionsformeln zur Berechnung der charakteristischen Polynome von symmetrischen Bandmatrizen, Dissertation*. Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany; 2008.Google Scholar - Bohner M, Došlý O, Kratz W:
**Discrete Reid roundabout theorems.***Dynamic Systems and Applications*1999,**8**(3–4):345–352.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Došlý O, Kratz W: Oscillation and spectral theory for symplectic difference systems with separated boundary conditions. to appear in Journal of Difference Equations and ApplicationsGoogle Scholar
- Bohner M, Došlý O, Kratz W:
**An oscillation theorem for discrete eigenvalue problems.***The Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics*2003,**33**(4):1233–1260. 10.1216/rmjm/1181075460MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Bohner M, Došlý O:
**Disconjugacy and transformations for symplectic systems.***The Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics*1997,**27**(3):707–743. 10.1216/rmjm/1181071889MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Bohner M, Došlý O, Kratz W:
**Inequalities and asymptotics for Riccati matrix difference operators.***Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*1998,**221**(1):262–286. 10.1006/jmaa.1997.5890MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Ahlbrandt CD, Peterson AC:
*Discrete Hamiltonian Systems: Difference Equations, Continued Fractions, and Riccati Equation, Kluwer Texts in the Mathematical Sciences*.*Volume 16*. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands; 1996:xiv+374.Google Scholar - Došlý O, Kratz W:
**Oscillation theorems for symplectic difference systems.***Journal of Difference Equations and Applications*2007,**13**(7):585–605. 10.1080/10236190701264776MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Strang G:
*Linear Algebra and Its Applications*. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA; 1976:xi+374.MATHGoogle Scholar - Bohner M, Došlý O, Kratz W:
**Sturmian and spectral theory for discrete symplectic systems.***Transactions of the American Mathematical Society*2009,**361**(6):3109–3123. 10.1090/S0002-9947-08-04692-8MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.